{"id":10744,"date":"2026-04-17T09:04:53","date_gmt":"2026-04-17T09:04:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/motorcycle-shock-absorber-oem-odm-lifecycle-management\/"},"modified":"2026-04-17T09:04:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T09:04:53","slug":"motorcycle-shock-absorber-oem-odm-lifecycle-management","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/motorcycle-shock-absorber-oem-odm-lifecycle-management\/","title":{"rendered":"Motorcycle Shock Absorber OEM\/ODM Lifecycle Management for Scalable Production"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image_1776240920-zrzdzd3z.jpeg\" alt=\"Technical illustration of motorcycle shock absorber OEM\/ODM lifecycle management for scalable production\" class=\"wp-image-10743\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image_1776240920-zrzdzd3z.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image_1776240920-zrzdzd3z-300x200.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image_1776240920-zrzdzd3z-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image_1776240920-zrzdzd3z-768x512.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image_1776240920-zrzdzd3z-18x12.jpeg 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Are Motorcycle Shock Absorber OEM\/ODM Services?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Motorcycle shock absorber OEM\/ODM services are often evaluated based on supplier capability\u2014but what engineering teams actually need is a way to compare suspension engineering services, OEM manufacturers, and validation systems in a structured way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you\u2019ve ever run a suspension program that looked \u201cdone\u201d in prototype but fell apart at volume, you already know the hard truth: <strong>OEM\/ODM success isn\u2019t decided by one clever shim stack.<\/strong> It\u2019s decided by whether your supplier can translate requirements into production reality\u2014repeatably, audibly, and with evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For an OEM engineering + procurement team, the goal isn\u2019t just \u201ca shock that feels good.\u201d It\u2019s a controlled lifecycle where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>requirements don\u2019t mutate mid-stream<\/p><\/li><li><p>validation is tied to real use cases (not lab theater)<\/p><\/li><li><p>the first production batches behave like the approved samples<\/p><\/li><li><p>change control doesn\u2019t become a permanent emergency<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This article lays out a stage-gated <strong>motorcycle shock absorber OEM\/ODM<\/strong> lifecycle you can use to manage programs for scalable production\u2014especially when SOP timing, APQP\/PPAP readiness, and batch stability matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why Motorcycle Shock Absorber OEM\/ODM Projects Fail<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Most failures are not \u201cmysteries.\u201d They\u2019re predictable failure modes that show up when engineering, quality, and procurement don\u2019t share one controlled process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Long development cycles and delayed time-to-market<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Development drags when requirements aren\u2019t translated into measurable engineering targets early.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Typical causes include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>unclear CTQs (critical-to-quality characteristics)<\/p><\/li><li><p>late packaging conflicts (mounting interfaces, reservoirs, clearance)<\/p><\/li><li><p>too many open variables at once (valving, spring, oil, adjusters, finishes)<\/p><\/li><li><p>no gate criteria\u2014only opinions<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>When there are no gates, iteration becomes the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Stage-Gated Development Process for Scalable OEM\/ODM Programs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>On paper, most suppliers will tell you they \u201cdo OEM.\u201d In practice, you\u2019re buying one of three capability levels\u2014and the wrong match is where programs blow up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p><strong>Design-only partner<\/strong>: They can help with conceptual design and some CAD, but they can\u2019t own validation, tooling readiness, or PPAP-level evidence. Good for early exploration; risky for SOP.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Prototyping-only supplier<\/strong>: They can build great samples, but their prototype build path doesn\u2019t map to line-speed assembly, controlled processes, and stable CTQs. This is where \u201cthe sample feels perfect\u201d turns into \u201cproduction feels different.\u201d<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Full-stack, SOP-ready OEM\/ODM manufacturer<\/strong>: They can translate requirements into CTQs, validate both design <em>and<\/em> process, and hold performance stable across batches with traceability and change control.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>A simple way to frame it for sourcing: <strong>low-cost vs validated<\/strong> isn\u2019t about piece price\u2014it\u2019s about whether the supplier can prove repeatability with evidence (capability snapshots, control plans, and reaction plans).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Selection Guide: Which OEM\/ODM Supplier Type Fits Your Program?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table class=\"has-fixed-layout\">\n<colgroup><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><\/colgroup><tbody><tr><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>If your program looks like\u2026<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>You likely need\u2026<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Why it fits<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Common failure if you choose the wrong type<\/p><\/th><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>You\u2019re still validating packaging, stroke, and mounting interfaces<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>A design-only partner (short-term) or a supplier that can support concept DFM<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Keeps iteration cheap while you lock interfaces and CTQs<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>You start tooling or quoting too early and absorb late changes<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>You need ride-feel tuning quickly, but SOP timing is flexible<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>A prototyping-only supplier (with clear handoff plan)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Fast samples help you converge on valving\/adjuster mapping<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Prototype build path doesn\u2019t map to production, causing batch drift later<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>You have SOP timing, warranty exposure, and batch stability requirements<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>A full-stack, SOP-ready OEM\/ODM manufacturer<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>They can validate design and process, and keep CTQs stable across batches<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>\u201cGreat sample, unstable production\u201d becomes a warranty and rework problem<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">OEM Supplier Comparison Table<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table class=\"has-fixed-layout\">\n<colgroup><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><\/colgroup><tbody><tr><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Supplier type<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>What they\u2019re good at<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Typical risks<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Keywords match<\/p><\/th><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Design-only partner<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Early concept direction, packaging review, basic DFM feedback<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Weak link to manufacturing reality; validation and ramp are pushed back to you<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>concept suspension design, early DFM<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Prototyping-only supplier<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Fast CNC samples, quick iteration on feel and adjuster mapping<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Prototype process \u2260 production process; batch stability issues after SOP<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>prototype shock absorber, ride-feel tuning<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>SOP-ready OEM\/ODM manufacturer<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>CTQ-driven engineering, controlled assembly parameters, batch traceability, change control<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Higher up-front discipline required; may reject unclear requirements<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>motorcycle shock manufacturers, OEM suspension system supplier<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Before you jump to RFQ questions, use the table above to clarify <strong>what you\u2019re actually buying<\/strong>; then use the checklist below to decide <strong>how you\u2019ll judge<\/strong> whether a suspension OEM\/ODM manufacturer can deliver it at SOP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to Evaluate a Suspension OEM Partner<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want a supplier who can scale, you need to evaluate them like a system\u2014not like a sample shop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Use these questions in RFQs and technical reviews with any <strong>OEM suspension system supplier<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p><strong>Can they translate your brief into CTQs<\/strong> for performance, durability, packaging, and appearance?<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Can they show measurement capability<\/strong> for those CTQs (e.g., MSA where it matters)?<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Can they demonstrate process control<\/strong> for oil fill\/bleed, nitrogen charge, torque sequencing, and critical tolerances?<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Can they prove batch stability<\/strong> with dyno sampling rules and defined acceptance windows?<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Can they show change control discipline<\/strong> so \u201cone tweak\u201d doesn\u2019t split batches or create mixed builds?<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Validation and Production Control<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to Choose a Motorcycle Shock Absorber OEM Manufacturer<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>If you\u2019re shortlisting an <strong>OEM motorcycle suspension supplier<\/strong>, keep the selection criteria tied to evidence\u2014not promises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A quick decision filter:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p><strong>Start with CTQs<\/strong>: confirm the supplier can turn your ride-feel and packaging brief into measurable targets.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Check validation relevance<\/strong>: ask how their dyno, fatigue, and environmental tests map to your duty cycle.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Verify process control<\/strong>: oil fill\/bleed, nitrogen charge, and torque sequencing should have documented settings and reaction plans.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Ask for stability proof<\/strong>: look for batch sampling rules and acceptance windows, not just \u201ca good sample.\u201d<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This same framework helps you compare <strong>custom motorcycle suspension OEM<\/strong> options without getting distracted by prototype-only performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Validation is where programs either become scalable\u2014or become warranty risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A practical validation stack should answer two questions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Does the design meet requirements under realistic stress?<\/p><\/li><li><p>Can the process repeatedly build the design within defined windows?<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>The gap happens when prototypes validate \u201cfunction,\u201d but production introduces different realities:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>tooling and fixture changes shift tolerances<\/p><\/li><li><p>assembly at line speed isn\u2019t the same as hand-built samples<\/p><\/li><li><p>measurement systems drift or aren\u2019t capable (MSA issues)<\/p><\/li><li><p>process settings (oil fill\/bleed, nitrogen charge, torque) aren\u2019t controlled tightly enough<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If your acceptance criteria are \u201cthis sample feels right,\u201d you\u2019re guaranteeing rework later. Consistency requires:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>defined CTQs for performance and assembly<\/p><\/li><li><p>control plans tied to those CTQs<\/p><\/li><li><p>traceability to connect any drift to a batch, shift, material lot, or machine<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This is why APQP-style thinking matters: validation shouldn\u2019t be a late-stage event\u2014it should be staged discipline with evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Durability and fatigue testing under high-cycle conditions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Fatigue validation should be tied to the load cases your platform actually sees:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>high-cycle vibration and repeated stroke events<\/p><\/li><li><p>worst-case loading (passenger + luggage, braking events, rough road duty)<\/p><\/li><li><p>seal wear and leak risk over time<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If your supplier can\u2019t explain how the test relates to your duty cycle, you don\u2019t have validation\u2014you have activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Environmental stress testing: heat, salt, and UV resistance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Environmental validation is where \u201clooks good\u201d becomes \u201clooks good after a season.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At minimum, align on:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>corrosion expectations (salt exposure, material choices)<\/p><\/li><li><p>thermal stability (hot-fade protocols, oil\/pressure stability)<\/p><\/li><li><p>finish durability and color stability (especially with branded anodizing)<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Production Consistency and Quality Control in Suspension Manufacturing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This is the conversion zone for OEM engineering procurement because it directly predicts SOP stability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Batch-to-batch damping consistency: dyno testing strategy<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Dyno testing can be used as a stability monitor\u2014not just a development tool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A robust approach typically includes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>defining which CTQs are verified by dyno sampling (e.g., force at key velocity nodes)<\/p><\/li><li><p>setting acceptance windows that reflect what the vehicle can tolerate<\/p><\/li><li><p>defining sampling rules by batch size and change events (new tooling, process change, material change)<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Process traceability and suspension manufacturing quality control<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Traceability is not a buzzword. It\u2019s how you avoid \u201cwe don\u2019t know what happened.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Evidence you should expect in scalable programs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>serialized tracking for critical components and finished units<\/p><\/li><li><p>documented incoming, in-process, and final checks<\/p><\/li><li><p>reaction plans for out-of-window results (what happens when drift is detected)<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For suppliers operating under IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 systems, traceability and process discipline are part of the baseline expectation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want a concrete example of how a supplier can structure gates and evidence for tooling, FAI, and SOP readiness, see Kingham Tech\u2019s internal walkthrough on <a target=\"_self\" rel=\"follow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/motorcycle-suspension-oem-odm-development-from-rider-brief-to-tooling-and-sop\/\">motorcycle suspension OEM\/ODM development<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Cost and Risk Trade-Offs in OEM Suspension Programs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Procurement pressure often shows up as one request: \u201cCan we make it faster?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The right question is: <strong>What can we parallelize without corrupting validation quality?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Balancing performance requirements with production cost<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Cost doesn\u2019t only live in piece price. It lives in:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>scrap and rework during ramp<\/p><\/li><li><p>extra inspection because capability is weak<\/p><\/li><li><p>warranty exposure because validation was thin<\/p><\/li><li><p>logistics volatility when schedules slip<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>A supplier who can show stable CTQs, capability snapshots, and a right-sized PPAP package often lowers total cost even if unit price isn\u2019t the absolute minimum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Optimizing lead time without compromising validation quality<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>You can usually compress timelines in three ways:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p><strong>Front-load DFM<\/strong> so tooling and process constraints are known early.<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Run parallel workstreams<\/strong> once interfaces and CTQs are frozen (prototype iterations alongside fixture\/tooling development).<\/p><\/li><li><p><strong>Use a pilot run + FAI gate<\/strong> before committing to volume.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>This is the same logic behind treating PPAP as the validation output of APQP (see <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/qualitytrainingportal.com\/resources\/apqp\/how-ppap-fits-into-apqp\/\">How PPAP fits into APQP<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Risk Management in OEM Suspension Development<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>A scalable program assumes things will change. The question is whether changes are controlled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Managing design iteration risks<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Iteration risk gets dangerous when changes happen without:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>updated CTQs<\/p><\/li><li><p>updated DFMEA\/PFMEA logic<\/p><\/li><li><p>updated control plan and inspection strategy<\/p><\/li><li><p>clear disposition of old stock and mixed builds<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If the supplier can\u2019t show change discipline, \u201cone small tweak\u201d becomes a batch-splitting event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ensuring engineering stability across product lifecycles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Lifecycle stability is a procurement issue, not just engineering:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>what triggers a design\/process change?<\/p><\/li><li><p>how are changes approved?<\/p><\/li><li><p>how is version control handled across drawings, BOM, and test reports?<\/p><\/li><li><p>how do you ensure service parts match the approved baseline?<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>A controlled lifecycle is what keeps year-two warranty from becoming a fire drill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion: A Controlled Engineering System for OEM Suspension Programs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Motorcycle shock absorber OEM\/ODM success is rarely about hero engineering. It\u2019s about a controlled system that makes engineering reproducible at scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want a simple way to evaluate suppliers, start with this: <strong>Ask them to walk you through their gates, and show the evidence they produce at each gate.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For reference, you can also review Kingham Tech\u2019s gated workflow from rider brief to tooling and SOP (linked earlier) and their <a target=\"_self\" rel=\"follow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/performance-suspension-for-motorcycle\/\">performance suspension<\/a> development framing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you\u2019re comparing <strong>motorcycle shock manufacturers<\/strong>, prioritize the ones that can prove batch stability, traceability, and change control\u2014not just deliver a great prototype.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><strong>Next step<\/strong>: If you want, share your platform\u2019s interface constraints and performance targets, and we can map them into a supplier gate checklist (CTQs, validation plan, and PPAP-ready evidence) you can use for RFQs.<\/p><\/blockquote>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A stage-gated OEM\/ODM workflow to prevent prototype-to-production drift, control batch consistency, and hit SOP with APQP\/PPAP discipline.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10743,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[104,103],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-front-shock","category-rear-shock"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10744\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10743"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kinghamtech.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}